A.4.1+Tech+Tools+Evaluation+Part+2

Copy and paste this template onto your individual wiki. v Use notemaking format only; no complete sentences. v Check spelling. v See the example at: [] (These can be your own ideas or ideas you have read about or discussed with the librarian interviewee.) || * possible to perform searches by reading and/or grade level, which will be helpful for creating collections reflective of student data as reported by MAP or other reading testing ||
 * A.4.1 – Technology Tools Evaluation, Part 2 Template**
 * Name of the Circulation/Collection Management Software: || Sirsi Dynix Symphony Work Flows 3.4.0J ||
 * Evaluator (Your Name): || Kathleen McKim ||
 * Description of the most user-friendly feature: || no user-friendly features at all, but purported better search capabilities ||
 * Benefit of this feature to students: || * theoretically possible to request books
 * theoretically possible to perform visual search
 * possibility of self check-out ||
 * Benefit of this feature to educators: || * theoretically possible to request books
 * theoretically possible to perform power- and advanced searches ||
 * Benefit of this feature to library administration: || * none at present
 * system is full of errors and program glitches ||
 * Description of a weakness of this software: || * visual search unappealing for elementary school students
 * system is not fully operational
 * system is not customizable ||
 * Additional ideas for the creative use of this software: